Agriculture, which had been among the sectors most severely affected by the Depression, had undergone significant transformation by 1939. In the United States, the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) and related programs had sought to raise farm prices by reducing production and providing price supports. These programs had achieved mixed results but had fundamentally altered the relationship between the federal government and the agricultural sector.
Technological innovation in agriculture had continued during the Depression years. The development of improved crop varieties, the increasing use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, and the gradual mechanization of farming had begun to transform agricultural productivity. By 1939, these trends were well underway, though they would accelerate dramatically during and after World War II.
The Dust Bowl experience had highlighted the environmental consequences of certain agricultural practices. By 1939, soil conservation had become a major concern, with the Soil Conservation Service and other agencies promoting more sustainable farming methods. This environmental awareness represented a significant shift in agricultural thinking.
The Financial System in 1939
Banking Sector Recovery and Reform
The banking system, which had been at the epicenter of the financial crisis in the early 1930s, had undergone substantial reform by 1939. In the United States, the Banking Act of 1933 (Glass-Steagall Act) had separated commercial and investment banking and created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to insure bank deposits. These reforms had significantly increased the stability of the banking system.
By 1939, the number of banks in the United States had declined substantially from pre-Depression levels, primarily due to failures during the banking crises of the early 1930s. The surviving banks were generally larger, more stable, and more tightly regulated than their predecessors. The banking system had become more concentrated, with larger banks holding a greater share of total assets.
Internationally, banking systems had also undergone significant changes. Many countries had implemented stricter banking regulations and established deposit insurance systems. The trend toward financial nationalization had accelerated in several European countries, with governments taking control of troubled financial institutions.
Capital Markets and Investment
Capital markets in 1939 remained subdued compared to pre-Depression levels. Stock prices, while having recovered significantly from their 1932 lows, remained well below their 1929 peaks in most countries. The New York Stock Exchange, for example, traded at approximately half its 1929 peak value in 1939.
Investment patterns had shifted during the Depression years. Corporate investment had declined substantially, as businesses faced uncertain demand and excess capacity. By 1939, investment had begun to recover but remained below pre-Depression levels. Government investment, particularly in public works and military spending, had become a more significant component of total investment.
The role of the government in capital markets had expanded significantly. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), established in 1934, had implemented new regulations for securities markets and corporate disclosure. These reforms had increased investor confidence but had also raised compliance costs for businesses.
International Finance and Debt
The international financial system in 1939 remained fragmented by the aftermath of the Depression. International lending, which had been a prominent feature of the 1920s, had declined substantially during the 1930s. The default on international debts by several countries during the Depression had made lenders more cautious.
The issue of war debts and reparations, which had been a major source of international friction during the 1920s and early 1930s, had been largely but not completely resolved by 1939. The Lausanne Conference of 1932 had effectively ended German reparations payments, and the United States had canceled some war debts, but significant international obligations remained.
Currency instability continued to characterize international financial relations. While most countries had abandoned the gold standard, few had established stable alternative arrangements. Currency manipulation and competitive devaluations remained common practices, as countries sought to gain export advantages.
The Political Economy of 1939
The Rise of Economic Nationalism
The Great Depression had given rise to economic nationalism across the political spectrum. By 1939, the idea that national economic policies should prioritize domestic interests over international considerations had become widely accepted. This shift represented a fundamental break from the liberal internationalism that had characterized the pre-Depression era.
Economic nationalism manifested in various forms across different countries. In democratic nations, it often took the form of protectionist trade policies, domestic content requirements, and preferences for domestic industries in government procurement. In authoritarian regimes, economic nationalism was more extreme, involving state control of key industries, autarkic policies, and economic self-sufficiency as a strategic goal.
The political appeal of economic nationalism was evident across the ideological spectrum. Right-wing movements emphasized national economic strength and independence, while left-wing movements focused on protecting domestic workers from international competition. This cross-ideological appeal made economic nationalism a persistent feature of the political landscape in 1939.
Government Intervention in the Economy
The Great Depression had fundamentally transformed attitudes toward government intervention in the economy. By 1939, the pre-Depression consensus favoring laissez-faire policies had been replaced by a broad acceptance of government responsibility for economic stability and growth.
This shift was reflected in the expansion of government economic activities across most countries. In the United States, the New Deal had created numerous federal agencies and programs aimed at regulating the economy, providing relief, and stimulating recovery. By 1939, the federal government had become a major economic actor, with spending representing a significantly larger share of GNP than before the Depression.
In Europe, the trend toward greater government intervention had taken various forms. The United Kingdom had developed a more managed form of capitalism, with increased regulation and social spending. France had experimented with planning under the Popular Front government. Germany and Italy had developed state-controlled economies directed toward military expansion.
The Political Business Cycle
The relationship between economic conditions and political outcomes had become more pronounced during the Depression years. By 1939, politicians were acutely aware of the electoral consequences of economic performance, leading to attempts to manipulate the economy for political advantage.
This awareness manifested in various ways. In democratic countries, incumbents often increased spending or implemented popular programs before elections. In the United States, for example, the WPA had been accused of directing funds to politically important areas. While the systematic study of political business cycles would develop later, the basic dynamic was clearly at play in 1939.
The economic situation in 1939 had significant political implications. In countries where recovery had been more robust, incumbent governments generally fared better. In countries with persistent economic problems, political instability and extremism remained significant concerns. This connection between economic performance and political outcomes would become even more pronounced during and after World War II.
The Approach of War and Economic Preparation
Military Spending and Economic Mobilization
By 1939, the approach of war had begun to reshape economic priorities across many countries. Military spending had increased significantly in several nations, as governments prepared for the conflict that many saw as inevitable. This military buildup had both economic and political consequences.
In Germany, military spending had become the dominant feature of the economy by 1939, representing approximately 20% of GNP. This massive military expenditure had been financed through deficit spending and had been the primary driver of the apparent economic recovery. The German economy had been effectively mobilized for war, with strict controls on consumption and investment.
In the United States, military spending remained relatively modest in 1939, representing less than 2% of GNP. However, President Roosevelt had begun to advocate for increased military preparedness, recognizing the growing threat from fascist regimes. The debate over rearmament would intensify dramatically after the outbreak of war in Europe.
In the United Kingdom, military spending had increased substantially during the late 1930s, as the government abandoned its earlier disarmament policies. By 1939, military spending represented approximately 12% of GNP, reflecting the serious approach to rearmament under Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain.
Economic Autarky and Self-Sufficiency
The approach of war had reinforced the trend toward economic autarky and self-sufficiency that had begun during the Depression. By 1939, many countries were actively seeking to reduce their dependence on international trade, particularly for essential goods and strategic materials.
Germany had pursued autarkic policies most aggressively, seeking to develop domestic substitutes for imported materials and to establish trade relationships that would be less vulnerable to blockade. The Four Year Plan, launched in 1936, had aimed to make Germany ready for war within four years by achieving economic self-sufficiency.
Japan had similarly pursued autarkic policies, seeking to establish control over resources in Asia through the “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere.” The invasion of China in 1937 had been motivated in part by the desire to secure access to raw materials and markets.
Even countries not actively preparing for aggressive war had begun to consider economic self-sufficiency. The United Kingdom had increased domestic agricultural production and had developed plans for economic mobilization in case of war. These preparations reflected the growing recognition that international economic relationships could not be taken for granted in an increasingly dangerous world.
Resource Allocation and Industrial Policy
The approach of war had led to greater government involvement in resource allocation and industrial policy. By 1939, many countries had begun to direct investment and production toward strategic industries, often through subsidies, tax incentives, or direct government control.
In Germany, the government had implemented strict controls on investment and production, directing resources toward industries deemed essential for military purposes. Private businesses had been required to obtain government approval for many investment decisions, and production priorities had been established by state authorities.
In the United States, while industrial mobilization had not yet begun in earnest, the government had taken steps to ensure that strategic industries would be prepared for increased production. The Naval Expansion Act of 1938 and the Air Corps Expansion Act of 1939 had provided funding for increased military production and had encouraged the development of industrial capacity.
The United Kingdom had gone further in preparing for industrial mobilization. The government had established the Ministry of Supply in 1939 to coordinate military procurement and had begun to develop plans for converting civilian industries to military production in case of war.
Comparing 1939 and Today: Economic Parallels and Differences
Global Economic Interdependence
One of the most striking differences between the economic landscape of 1939 and today is the degree of global economic interdependence. In 1939, the international economy was fragmented by protectionism, currency controls, and imperial preference systems. International trade represented a relatively small share of global economic activity compared to today.
Today, by contrast, the global economy is characterized by unprecedented interdependence. International supply chains span multiple countries, with components for a single product often manufactured in several different nations. International trade represents a much larger share of global GDP than it did in 1939, and financial markets are closely integrated across borders.
This difference has significant implications for how economic crises unfold and how policymakers respond. In 1939, the relative insulation of national economies meant that policy interventions could be implemented with fewer international repercussions. Today, the close integration of global economies means that policy decisions in one major economy can have immediate effects worldwide, requiring greater international coordination.
Financial System Stability
The financial systems of 1939 and today differ dramatically in terms of stability, regulation, and sophistication. In 1939, the financial system was still recovering from the banking crises of the early 1930s. Banking regulations had been tightened, but the system remained relatively simple and unsophisticated by modern standards.
Today’s financial system is vastly more complex, with a wide array of financial instruments, institutions, and markets that did not exist in 1939. Derivatives, securitization, electronic trading, and global banking conglomerates have created a system that is more efficient but also more opaque and potentially more fragile.
The regulatory environment has also evolved significantly. While the basic framework of banking regulation established in the 1930s remains influential, today’s financial system is subject to a much more elaborate and comprehensive regulatory structure. However, the financial crisis of 2007-2009 demonstrated that modern financial systems remain vulnerable to instability, despite sophisticated regulation.
Labor Market Dynamics
Labor markets in 1939 and today differ in several important respects. In 1939, manufacturing and agriculture employed a much larger share of the workforce than they do today. The service sector was relatively small, and knowledge-based industries were in their infancy.
Today, most developed economies are dominated by service sector employment, with manufacturing representing a smaller share of total employment. The rise of the knowledge economy has created new types of jobs and skills requirements, while automation and globalization have transformed manufacturing employment.
Unionization represents another significant difference. In 1939, labor unions were at the height of their influence in many countries, representing a substantial share of the workforce. Today, unionization rates have declined significantly in most developed economies, particularly in the private sector.
The nature of work has also changed. In 1939, the standard employment model of full-time, long-term employment with a single employer was dominant. Today, while this model remains important, there has been significant growth in non-standard forms of employment, including part-time work, temporary work, and independent contracting.
Government Economic Role
The role of government in the economy has expanded dramatically since 1939. In 1939, the New Deal and similar programs in other countries had established the principle of government responsibility for economic stability and social welfare, but government spending as a share of GDP remained relatively modest by today’s standards.
Today, government spending represents a much larger share of GDP in most developed countries, reflecting the expansion of social programs, defense spending, and other government functions. The modern welfare state, with its comprehensive systems of social insurance, healthcare, and education, had not yet fully emerged in 1939.
The regulatory environment has also become more extensive. Today, governments regulate a wide range of economic activities that were largely unregulated in 1939, including environmental protection, consumer safety, workplace safety, and anti-discrimination. This expanded regulatory role reflects changing social expectations about the responsibilities of government.
Technological Change and Economic Transformation
The pace and nature of technological change represent another significant difference between 1939 and today. In 1939, technological innovation was primarily focused on improving existing industrial processes and products. The major technological revolutions of the 20th century—electronics, computers, biotechnology, and the internet—were still in their infancy.
Today, we are experiencing a period of rapid technological transformation that is fundamentally changing the economy and society. Artificial intelligence, automation, big data, and renewable energy technologies are reshaping industries, creating new business models, and transforming labor markets.
The economic implications of technological change also differ. In 1939, technological change was generally seen as positive, creating new industries and improving living standards. Today, while technological innovation continues to create opportunities, there are also concerns about its potential to displace workers, increase inequality, and create new forms of economic insecurity.
Lessons from 1939 for Today’s Economic Challenges
The Importance of Economic Security
One of the most important lessons from 1939 is the fundamental importance of economic security for social and political stability. The Great Depression had demonstrated that economic insecurity could lead to social unrest, political extremism, and the breakdown of democratic institutions. By 1939, the establishment of social safety nets and economic security programs had become widely accepted as essential for maintaining social cohesion.
Today, as we face economic challenges including technological disruption, globalization, and the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the lesson of 1939 remains relevant. Economic insecurity—whether related to employment, income, or access to essential services—continues to pose significant risks to social and political stability. The rise of populist movements in many countries reflects, in part, a response to economic insecurity and inequality.
The experience of 1939 suggests that addressing economic insecurity requires more than just economic growth; it requires deliberate policies to ensure that the benefits of growth are widely shared and that basic needs are met for all members of society. This lesson has particular relevance today as we grapple with the economic consequences of technological change and globalization.
The Dangers of Economic Nationalism
The economic nationalism that characterized 1939 had emerged as a response to the Great Depression, as countries sought to protect their domestic economies from international competition. While understandable in the context of the crisis, this turn toward protectionism and economic isolation had exacerbated the Depression and contributed to international tensions.
Today, we are seeing a resurgence of economic nationalism in many parts of the world. Trade disputes, restrictions on foreign investment, and calls for economic self-sufficiency reflect similar impulses to those that dominated in 1939. The lesson from 1939 is that while economic nationalism may seem appealing in the short term, it ultimately leads to worse outcomes for all countries.
The global economic system established after World War II, with its commitment to open trade and international cooperation, was based on the recognition that the economic nationalism of the 1930s had been disastrous. Today, as we face challenges to this system, it is important to remember the lessons of 1939 and the dangers of retreating into economic nationalism.
The Need for International Economic Cooperation
The fragmentation of the international economic system in 1939 reflected the failure of international cooperation during the Depression. The inability of countries to coordinate their economic policies had contributed to the severity and length of the crisis. By 1939, the lack of effective international economic cooperation had become a significant problem.
Today, the global economy faces numerous challenges that require international cooperation, including climate change, pandemics, financial stability, and technological governance. The lesson from 1939 is that international cooperation is not just desirable but essential for addressing these challenges effectively.
The post-World War II period demonstrated the benefits of international economic cooperation through institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the World Trade Organization. While these institutions have their flaws and require reform, they represent an important recognition of the need for cooperation in the global economy.
The Role of Fiscal and Monetary Policy
The experience of the Great Depression and the economic conditions of 1939 had fundamentally transformed thinking about fiscal and monetary policy. By 1939, the idea that governments had a responsibility to use fiscal and monetary policy to stabilize the economy had become widely accepted, at least in principle.
Today, this understanding forms the basis of macroeconomic policymaking in most countries. Central banks use monetary policy to influence interest rates, credit conditions, and inflation, while governments use fiscal policy to influence aggregate demand and economic growth.
However, the experience of 1939 also offers cautionary lessons about the limitations of these tools. The “Roosevelt Recession” of 1937-1938 demonstrated that premature tightening of fiscal and monetary policy could derail recovery. Today, as central banks and governments consider withdrawing stimulus measures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, this lesson remains relevant.
The challenge of balancing short-term stabilization with long-term sustainability is as relevant today as it was in 1939. The experience of 1939 suggests that policymakers must be cautious about withdrawing support too early and must pay attention to the broader economic context when making policy decisions.
The Relationship Between Economic and Political Stability
The events leading up to 1939 demonstrated the close relationship between economic conditions and political stability. The economic instability of the Depression years had contributed to the rise of extremist ideologies and the breakdown of democratic institutions in several countries.
Today, as we face economic challenges including inequality, insecurity, and disruption, the relationship between economic and political stability remains as important as ever. The rise of populist movements in many countries reflects, in part, a response to economic dissatisfaction and insecurity.
The lesson from 1939 is that economic policies cannot be separated from their political consequences. Policies that increase economic insecurity or inequality can undermine political stability, even if they appear sound from a purely economic perspective. Conversely, policies that promote economic security and inclusion can strengthen democratic institutions and social cohesion.
Conclusion: The Enduring Relevance of 1939
The economic landscape of 1939, standing at the intersection of the Great Depression and World War II, offers valuable insights for understanding our contemporary economic challenges. While the specific economic conditions of 1939 differ significantly from those of today, the fundamental lessons about economic policy, international cooperation, and the relationship between economic and political stability remain relevant.
The experience of 1939 reminds us of the importance of economic security for social and political stability, the dangers of economic nationalism, the need for international cooperation, and the complex relationship between economic policies and political outcomes. These lessons have particular relevance today as we face economic challenges including technological disruption, globalization, inequality, and the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
As we look to the future, the economic landscape of 1939 serves as both a warning and an inspiration. It warns us of the dangers of economic insecurity, nationalism, and international conflict. It inspires us with the recognition that, through thoughtful economic policies and international cooperation, we can build a more stable, prosperous, and inclusive global economy.
The enduring relevance of 1939 lies not in specific policy prescriptions but in the broader understanding of economic dynamics that it provides. By studying this pivotal moment in economic history, we gain valuable perspectives on our current challenges and opportunities, helping us to navigate the complex economic landscape of the 21st century.
FAQs
- What was the economic situation in 1939 compared to the worst years of the Great Depression?
By 1939, the global economy had recovered significantly from the depths of the Depression but had not returned to pre-1929 levels. Unemployment had decreased but remained high, international trade was still below pre-Depression levels, and many economic vulnerabilities persisted.
- How did unemployment rates in 1939 compare to today’s rates?
In 1939, the unemployment rate in the United States was approximately 17%, much higher than today’s rates, which typically range between 3-5% in normal economic conditions. However, unemployment calculations have changed over time, making direct comparisons challenging.
- What were the main economic policies implemented by 1939 to address the Great Depression?
By 1939, major economic policies included the New Deal programs in the United States, which focused on relief, recovery, and reform; the abandonment of the gold standard by most countries; increased government spending; and the establishment of social safety nets.
- How did the approach of World War II affect the global economy in 1939?
The approach of war led to increased military spending, economic preparation for conflict, a shift toward autarky and self-sufficiency, and greater government control over economic activity. These factors began to reshape economic priorities and policies across many countries.
- What was the role of fiscal policy in economic recovery by 1939?
Fiscal policy had become a key tool for economic stimulation by 1939. Governments had increased spending on public works, relief programs, and military preparedness, often financed through deficit spending. This represented a significant shift from pre-Depression fiscal orthodoxy.
- How did monetary policy change during the Depression years leading up to 1939?
Monetary policy underwent significant transformation, with most countries abandoning the gold standard, which had constrained their policy options. Central banks adopted more accommodative policies, lowering interest rates and providing liquidity to the banking system.
- What was the state of international trade in 1939?
International trade in 1939 remained substantially below pre-Depression levels due to protectionist policies, tariff barriers, and the breakdown of the international trading system. Bilateral trade agreements had replaced the more universal approach to international commerce.
- How did the banking system in 1939 differ from today’s banking system?
The banking system of 1939 was simpler, more heavily regulated, and less globally integrated than today’s system. Key differences included the separation of commercial and investment banking (Glass-Steagall Act), the absence of sophisticated financial instruments, and less extensive international interconnections.
- What was the relationship between economic conditions and political extremism in 1939?
Economic insecurity and hardship during the Depression years had contributed to the rise of political extremism in many countries. By 1939, this relationship was evident in the growth of fascist and communist movements that offered radical solutions to economic problems.
- How did the labor market in 1939 differ from today’s labor market?
The labor market of 1939 was dominated by manufacturing and agriculture, with a smaller service sector than today. Unionization was higher, employment was more standardized, and technological change had less impact on job creation and destruction than it does today.
- What was the role of government in the economy by 1939?
By 1939, government had become a much more significant economic actor than before the Depression. Governments were actively involved in economic stabilization, regulation, social welfare provision, and, in some cases, direct economic management.
- How did inequality in 1939 compare to today?
While direct comparisons are difficult due to differences in measurement, inequality remained high by historical standards in 1939, though it had declined somewhat from its pre-Depression peak. Today, inequality has risen significantly in many countries over recent decades.
- What technological innovations emerged during the Depression years that were evident by 1939?
Despite the economic crisis, the 1930s saw significant technological innovations, including advances in aviation, telecommunications, chemicals (notably nylon), and automotive technology. These innovations laid the groundwork for post-war economic growth.
- How did agricultural policies change during the Depression years?
Agricultural policies shifted toward greater government intervention, with programs aimed at raising farm prices through production controls, price supports, and surplus management. The Agricultural Adjustment Act in the U.S. exemplified this approach.
- What was the impact of the Dust Bowl on the American economy by 1939?
The Dust Bowl had devastated agricultural production in the Great Plains, leading to farm failures, migration, and increased poverty. By 1939, it had prompted significant changes in agricultural practices and policies, including greater emphasis on soil conservation.
- How did the New Deal programs change the American economy by 1939?
The New Deal had fundamentally transformed the American economy by establishing social safety nets (Social Security), regulating financial markets (SEC), supporting labor rights (Wagner Act), and creating jobs through public works programs (WPA).
- What was the economic situation in Europe in 1939?
Europe’s economic situation varied significantly by country. The UK had experienced relatively robust recovery, France remained stagnant, Germany had directed its economy toward rearmament, and the Soviet Union was pursuing rapid industrialization through central planning.
- How did economic nationalism manifest in 1939?
Economic nationalism in 1939 took various forms, including protectionist trade policies, preferences for domestic industries, currency manipulation, and, in extreme cases, autarkic policies aimed at economic self-sufficiency.
- What was the role of the gold standard in the economic policies of 1939?
By 1939, most countries had abandoned the gold standard, which had constrained monetary policy during the Depression. This abandonment allowed for more flexible monetary policies and greater government control over domestic economic conditions.
- How did the approach of war affect economic policies in 1939?
The approach of war led to increased military spending, preparation for economic mobilization, greater government control over strategic industries, and policies aimed at achieving self-sufficiency in essential materials and production.
- What lessons from 1939 are relevant for addressing today’s economic inequality?
The experience of 1939 highlights the importance of addressing economic insecurity and inequality to maintain social and political stability. It suggests that deliberate policies are needed to ensure that economic growth is broadly shared and that basic needs are met.
- How did the financial crisis of the 1930s change banking regulation by 1939?
The banking crises led to significant regulatory reforms, including the separation of commercial and investment banking (Glass-Steagall Act), the establishment of deposit insurance (FDIC), and increased oversight of banking activities.
- What was the relationship between economic policy and political outcomes in 1939?
Economic conditions significantly influenced political outcomes in 1939, with persistent economic problems contributing to political instability and extremism. Politicians had become more aware of the electoral consequences of economic performance.
- How did the global economic system in 1939 differ from today’s system?
The global economic system of 1939 was fragmented, protectionist, and less integrated than today’s system. International trade played a smaller role, financial markets were less connected, and economic cooperation was limited compared to today’s interconnected global economy.
- What was the impact of the Depression on demographic trends by 1939?
The Depression had significantly affected demographic trends, with declining birth and marriage rates during the crisis years. By 1939, these rates had begun to recover but remained below pre-Depression levels. Migration patterns had also been affected, with reduced international migration.
- How did cultural attitudes toward the economy change by 1939?
Cultural attitudes had shifted significantly, with greater acceptance of government intervention in the economy, increased skepticism toward unregulated markets, and a stronger expectation that governments should ensure economic security.
- What was the role of women in the economy by 1939?
Women’s economic role remained limited by social norms and legal barriers, though the Depression had pushed more women into the workforce out of necessity. Women were concentrated in low-wage jobs and faced significant discrimination in employment.
- How did the economic conditions of 1939 influence the outbreak of World War II?
Economic factors, including resource scarcity, trade conflicts, and the desire for economic self-sufficiency, contributed to the tensions that led to World War II. The economic instability of the 1930s had created conditions favorable to aggressive nationalism.
- What parallels exist between the economic nationalism of 1939 and today’s economic policies?
Today’s economic nationalism, including trade disputes, restrictions on foreign investment, and calls for economic self-sufficiency, parallels the protectionism and economic isolation of 1939. Both reflect responses to economic insecurity and globalization.
- How can the lessons of 1939 inform our approach to current economic challenges?
The lessons of 1939 highlight the importance of economic security, international cooperation, balanced fiscal and monetary policies, and the relationship between economic and political stability. These insights can guide policymakers in addressing today’s economic challenges, including technological disruption, inequality, and globalization.
Disclaimer: The content on this blog is for informational purposes only. Author’s opinions are personal and not endorsed. Efforts are made to provide accurate information, but completeness, accuracy, or reliability are not guaranteed. Author is not liable for any loss or damage resulting from the use of this blog. It is recommended to use information on this blog at your own terms.
